How to standardize health data from devices

health data

Wearable devices generate massive volumes of health data every day. From heart rate and activity to sleep and recovery metrics, devices like Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Garmin provide valuable insights that power modern health, fitness, and wellness applications.

The challenge is not access to data. The challenge is standardization.

Each device uses its own data models, naming conventions, sampling frequencies, and calculation logic. Without standardization, teams face fragmented datasets, inconsistent metrics, and complex downstream analytics.

Why wearable data standardization matters

Without a standardized data layer, teams typically encounter:

  • Multiple schemas for the same metric (for example, heart rate or sleep)

  • Inconsistent units and timestamps

  • Different definitions for the same concept (steps, calories, sleep stages)

  • Increased engineering overhead and maintenance costs

  • Limited ability to scale analytics and AI models

Standardization turns raw device data into reliable, comparable, and usable information.

Key differences between Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Garmin data

Each ecosystem was built with different priorities.

Fitbit

  • Strong focus on daily activity and sleep

  • Cloud-based data access

  • Device-calculated metrics

  • Simplified data structures

Apple Watch (HealthKit)

  • Highly granular and privacy-driven

  • On-device data access only

  • Broad range of health signals

  • User-controlled permissions per data type

Garmin

  • Performance and training oriented

  • Advanced fitness and physiological metrics

  • Batch-style data delivery

  • Device-specific calculations

These differences make direct comparison difficult without a normalization layer.

wearable data

Core steps to standardize wearable health data

1. Define a canonical data model

Start by defining a device-agnostic schema that represents:

  • Metric name

  • Unit of measurement

  • Timestamp and time zone

  • Data source

  • Sampling frequency

  • Confidence or completeness indicators

This model becomes your internal source of truth.

2. Normalize units and timestamps

Devices report data using different units and time references.

Best practices include:

  • Convert all metrics to standard units

  • Align timestamps to a single time zone (usually UTC)

  • Normalize sampling intervals

  • Handle overlapping or duplicate data points

3. Align metric definitions

The same metric can mean different things across devices.

Examples:

  • Calories (active vs total)

  • Sleep stages and scoring

  • Activity intensity thresholds

Standardization requires mapping device-specific definitions to a common interpretation.

4. Handle missing and inconsistent data

Wearable data is inherently imperfect.

You need logic to:

  • Detect gaps and partial data

  • Flag unreliable measurements

  • Merge overlapping sessions

  • Handle device switching by users

This step is critical for analytics and AI readiness.

5. Create a unified ingestion and processing pipeline

A scalable approach includes:

  • Device-specific ingestion adapters

  • A normalization layer

  • Validation and enrichment logic

  • A unified API or data access layer

This architecture separates device complexity from product logic.

wearable health data

Common pitfalls to avoid

  • Treating all devices as equal without understanding their differences

  • Hardcoding logic for each new wearable

  • Ignoring data quality and confidence

  • Mixing raw and normalized data in analytics

  • Underestimating long-term maintenance costs

Building vs buying a standardization layer

Teams usually face two options.

Build in-house

Pros:

  • Full control

  • Custom data models

Cons:

  • High engineering cost

  • Ongoing maintenance

  • Slow to support new devices

Use a unified wearable data platform

Pros:

  • Faster integration

  • Pre-normalized data

  • Scales with new devices and metrics

Cons:

  • Less customization at the raw level

For most teams, the decision comes down to speed, scale, and long-term cost.

standardization

Conclusion

Standardizing health data from devices like Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Garmin is essential for building reliable, scalable health products.

Without standardization, wearable data remains fragmented and difficult to use. With the right data model, normalization strategy, and processing pipeline, teams can turn raw device signals into consistent, high-quality inputs for analytics, personalization, and AI.

The teams that invest early in standardization are better positioned to scale faster and build more intelligent health experiences.

Previous
Previous

How to use wearable data in AI health models

Next
Next

Apple Health vs Health Connect: pros, cons & integration